Myra – Marcus Harvey

There are many evils in the world.  On a small scale… Anchovies.  On a larger scale war, murder, rape, abuse, bullying… we each have our own version of what evil looks like, yet we unite in the iconic images which represent an wrong done or atrocity created.  I think we can all pretty much agree that Hitler is one of the most well known faces, and is associated with utter carnage and despicable acts against many thousands of people.  But why do we use and recognise these people?  It could be argued that their images are still used in the media and in the art world today as a reference point and a reminder, it could be that to some degree we all have a morbid fascination with the acts that they committed, in a vain attempt to understand what drove them to behave in the way that they did.

I know I have readers all over the world, so that means, you may not necessarily know who Myra Hindley is, although if you are in the UK, there is no doubt you have come across this picture or the original press photo before.

Myra Hindley was an associate in the Moors murders between 1963 and 1965, around the location of Manchester – England.  The victims were five children between the ages of 10 – 17 who were sexually abused and then murdered.  Ian Brady and Myra Hindley were arrested in 1965, but only three victims were known about at that time, and it was only in 1985 that Brady admitted to more, the investigation was reopened.  Both assisted with the finding of the final resting place of their two previously unknown victims.

Hindley was dubbed “the most evil woman in Britain”, but she made many appeals against her life sentence throughout her incarceration, but she was never released and died at the age of 60 in 2002.  Ian Brady on the other hand was declared criminally insane, and made it clear that he never wanted to be released, dying in 2017 at the age of 79.

There are several views on the role of Hindley in these murders, some saying that she didn’t murder any of them, but she was blinded by love which made her follow Brady’s actions, while others see her as the driving force behind the killings.  Regardless of how much or little she took part in these acts, she was still present and didn’t stop them from taking place.

This then begs the question, why would Harvey want to create such a large and dynamic portrait of “the most evil women in Britain”?  The piece was created in 1995 and was displayed as part of the “Sensation” exhibit at the Royal Academy of Art in 1997.  The work is 9 by 11 foot and is a dominating piece to any exhibition area.

At the time of the exhibit, this piece was met with much controversy, with four members of the Royal Academy resigning in protest.  Prior to the opening the met police and vice units visited the display, but could find insufficient evidence of public indecency.  Charity Kidscape protested the piece on its opening day, saying that the Royal academy were using it as a way to draw in paying visitors to address their financial deficit.  By some parties (quite rightly), they felt that this was an exploitation and glorification of the murders which had been committed, and did not take in to account the feelings of the families and friends of those impacted.

On the other hand, Norman Rosenthal, secretary of the Royal Academy stated that it was the single most important piece in the exhibit and made for a sobering and cathartic experience.

The painting, at a glance, looks to be a highly magnified painting of the press photo which was plastered all over the tabloids everytime a story was run about the murderous couple.  On closer inspection, it is build up of tiny hand prints in white, black and grey.  This serves as a juxtaposition of innocences of those murdered to the atrocities committed by the adult in the painting.

A close up reveals how this piece has been brought together.


Many layers of the hand prints have been overlaid to present the final image of Hindley.  It is so precise in its replication of the photo, that is presents an ominous and imposing feel.  The fingers, when noticed, almost appear to be clawing…pleading against the face of Hindley.

Harvey said about the piece “I know enough to know that she probably didn’t do any of the murders, that she was just in a relationship where she was probably too attached to the man who was doing it to extricate herself. That her life was probably too dull and boring to throw the relationship away … I don’t believe that’s 30 years’ worth of reputation as one of the most vile and notorious murderers in British criminal history.”  Which I think is a rather misguided statement.

With all of this information, it is still difficult to ignore how this painting makes any viewer feel.  Such is the iconography of this woman that is fills its audience with a silent horror which is hard to verbalise.  If we look at this as simply a piece of art, it has done its job, evoked feelings through a visual medium, it challenges its audience’s perception of what it is seeing through the innocence of the hands to the notorious face. It dominates and it terrifies, with the stark image of the hardened face and peroxide bouffant, her unapologetic eyes staring out.  An unsympathetic moment to the victims families captured for an eternity.

Even now, this piece causes controversy, with threats and complaints still received over its existence.

Why do you think artists use notorious icons in their work?  Why not tell me in the comments?  Like this post?  Why not share it?



2 thoughts on “Myra – Marcus Harvey

Add yours

  1. Very interesting piece. I didn’t know the history so I’m looking at it with fresh eyes and yet still have the horror evoked. I think it’s probably easier to evoke a negative response to a piece of art that will be remembered and talked about than to try to evoke a positive emotion. The symbolism of the hand prints to make the piece is brilliant and causes that guttural response to be even stronger. It may not be a topic we like, but it’s a piece that causes controversy and discussion…and thus is memorable. Bravo!!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. What is morality without examples? Can we know evil without having seen it? Can we know good? Would a child raised in total isolation know that stealing was bad? What if the theft caused the death of another? Would such a child realize they were indirectly responsible of murder?

    I don’t know. Do we have inbred ethics? Perhaps, to some degree.

    I’d hypothesize that artists who create controversial pieces do so intentionally, as provocational experiments. “What can I get away with?” I wonder if artists like these are armchair psychologists teasing at a society’s threads to see what unravels.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at

Up ↑

Philosopher Muse

An explorer of volition and soul

The Devil's Playground

The journey through mental health by a sardonic soul

Fort of melancholy

Art & Photography

Ailish Sinclair

Stories and photos from Scotland

Memoirs of Miss Salt...........

Memories of past and present antics!

A Voice in the Dark

An Independent film company

Rich Pieces

Obsessed with film since 1982

BENLEANDER_Design Studio

Branded Storytelling and Visual Design

Big Art Theory Blog

a place where art meets literature in a way unseen before

Zhiguai Translations

Classical Chinese tales of the strange and anomalous, translated (roughly) by Geoff Humble.

Bitchin’ in the Kitchen

..because the thoughts that fall, kicking and screaming from my head need a safe place to land..


MarkovichUniverse AT

Finding French Charming

Finding True Love.. Even After Forty

My expressions

unexpressed thoughts

Channel Zero Archives

Analysis, images, meta & more, celebrating the surreal horror classic, currently streaming on Shudder

Quaint Revival

quirks, quips & photo clicks

It's Turpintime!

Stuff & Bits For The Muddled and Addled.

Things that happened on this date in history. Probably.

Eerie Unsolved

A Mix-Up of Mysteries, Conspiracie and All Things Spooky!

The Battles of Frankie

The failings and anecdotes of an average Aussie woman

The Indy Diarist

A Day in the Life

Leggings & Tea

Books. Art. Life.


Tiling.Renovation. Restoration.Photography

High Lumen

lighting design blog

Lady with Black Lipstick

Hopeless romantic speaking her thoughts.


This is the page where I will share my thoughts about football, my memories and funny stories.

The Latent Being

Believer of Freedom of Mind


A panorama is defined as an unbroken view of the whole region surrounding an observer. My panorama includes a jumbled mess of ideas and thoughts waiting to be typed out. Welcome to my panorama.

Marina Baker

marketing, social media, & business development

Chef Dave, Esq.

Lawyer by trade -- Cook by passion

Dr. Eric Perry’s Blog

Motivate | Inspire | Uplift

Cryssy’s Blog

Loving YOU without the Mask!


just a regular human trying to survive in the city


Your Source For The Coolest Science Stories

Amdall Gallery

Artwork, data analysis, and other projects by Jon

The Planet According to Dom

Where humour and adventure collide

O' Canada

Reflections on Canadian Culture From Below the Border

%d bloggers like this: